Development in every field is an essential virtue. More so, resilience is a key factor to the developments. Therefore, the facts that trigger the resilience of the field are obtainable from research. Thorough research concerning the relevant issues affecting the field provides a foundation for ultimate development. In each field, there is a season for advancement. For instance, the field of communication has prominent developments in the recent past. The modern modes of communication are better than the ancient methods. Currently, communication is easier and faster. Research boosted the inventions that exist currently.
Research is not always perfect. The world ought to adhere to this harsh reality. The interaction of the researcher and the topic is paramount. The affiliation of these factors highly dictates the outcome of the research. During the course of the investigation, the researchers generate propositions. At times, the propositions are fictional (Verba, 2014). This is because the propositions are entirely reliant to the researcher’s judgment. The human judgment might alienate from reality. In this context, certainty of the information is unattainable. The researchers capitalize on reliability, validity, and honesty of the conclusion. These are the only points of improvement in research. In most scenarios, researchers base their propositions on scientific background.
Considering scientific propositions, not all facts are congruent to the society (Verba, 2014). In science, biological evolution is a gradual process that exists up to date. This is a fact that does not justify the origin of the universe to all members of the society. The religions have their established facts about the origin of the universe. The scientific propositions about this topic are authentic to the religious members of the society. It is also evident that much assumption is involved in the evolution theory. The assumptions give a reason to the incredibility of the theory. A perfect research is independent from assumptions. This factor waters down the optimism of perfect research.
In scientific investigation, the researchers indulge into imperfect application of some theoretical standards. This is evident in the previous analogy. The application of the theories is unrealistic, but the researchers abide by it for the purpose of the ultimate objective. The assumptions justify the occurrences in the scientific world. In this field, there are rules regulating the articulations of the researchers. The researchers ignore the rules when more assumption necessitates the justification to various facts (Verba, 2014). The assumptions perpetuate incredibility of the information in the society. This disqualifies perfect research in the societal set-up.
As denoted previously, the liaison amid the researcher and the investigation is paramount (Denzin, 2009). The scales and instruments in the field create range of attitudes to the researcher. The researcher is prone to make errors in graphs. The sophisticated graphs have elevated odds towards errors. In this context, the researcher undertakes many approximations. The approximations stabilize the statistical imbalance in the graphs. The estimations give inaccurate figures about the research. In this scenario, the conclusion of the research is prone to instability. Instability perpetuates the incredibility of the research. Clearly, this is an imperfect research regardless of its conclusion. In research, perfection cannot exist.
Despite the revolutions brought by research, assumptions and errors constitute the best part of it. Research is an imperfect exercise that facilitates resilient aspects. The outcome is extremely beneficial. It is unfortunate that research cannot be perfect. There is no hope for perfect research.
Denzin, N. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Jersey, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Verba, V. (2014). Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Check below the PDF Sample.